Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Ronald Veteto v. Roy Hightower, et al
as 21-14126
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD D. VETETO
Defendant / Appellee:
ROY HIGHTOWER, Warden, in his individual and official capacity, W. G. POWELL, Deputy Warden, in his individual and official capacity, DAVID STILL, Supervisor, in his individual and official capacity and others
W&G Machine Company, Inc. v. US
as 20-1524
Plaintiff / Appellant:
W&G MACHINE COMPANY, INC.
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES and THE BOEING COMPANY
United States of America v. Produce Exch. of L.A., et al
as 2:2019mc00097
Defendant:
Willardson Co., Inc., Sidney Feldstein, Southern California Egg Council and others
Plaintiff:
United States of America
United States of America v. California Wholesale Grocers Assn et al
as 2:2019mc00086
Defendant:
H. Nau, Sussman, Wormser & Co., A. R. Johnston and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, and United States of America
In re: E W G E Corporation, a Corporation
as 1:2014mc00003
Taxpayer:
E W G E Corporation
STEWART et al v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
as 1:2012cv01654
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
Plaintiff:
SHAVON STEWART , A. D. , GEROLEAN CURETON and others
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Henderson v. Jordan et al
as 4:2009cv00937
Plaintiff:
F. Charlene Henderson
Defendant:
John R. Jordan, Jr., Bobby L. Martin, Aubrey B. Patterson and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
King v. Bredesen et al
as 3:2008mc00154
Plaintiff:
LaBryant King
Defendant:
Phil Bredesen, Tennessee Board of Probation and Paroles, Tennessee Department of Correction and others
W. G. Brown v. Ford Motor Co., et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-68285
Plaintiff:
W. G. Brown
Defendant:
Ford Motor Co
Shelton v. Tennessee Department of Correction et al
as 3:2008mc00058
Plaintiff:
Ronald Shelton
Defendant:
Tennessee Department of Correction, George W. Little, Debra K. Inglis and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
