Cases 1 - 10 of 765
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02737
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC v. Lambert Engineering and Construction Services, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
C.J. Mahan Construction Company LLC
Respondent:
Lambert Engineering and Construction Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
United Spinal Association, et al. v. State of California, et al.
as 24-2755
Plaintiff:
UNITED SPINAL ASSOCIATION, NOT DEAD YET, INSTITUTE FOR PATIENTS RIGHTS and others
Defendant:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, GAVIN NEWSOM, ROBERT BONTA and others
Other:
COMPASSION & CHOICES ACTION NETWORK, LAMBERT BASSLER, JUDITH COBURN and others
Hoglan et al v. Soulas et al
as 1:2024mc21627
Plaintiff:
Candyce S Hoglan, Kui Liong Lee, Kiu Liong Lee and others
Defendant:
Nicole Soulas, Frederick Soulas and Jordan Steiner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Anthony Dale, et al
as 24-8013
Petitioner:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY DALE, BRETT JACKSON, JOHNNA FOX and others
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Qsar et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Jordan Qsar, Grant Witherspoon, Austin Bernard and others
Ormsby v. Thornell
as 24-1719
Petitioner:
LAMBERT JOHN ORMSBY
Respondent:
RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION
Lambert v. Kastle, et al.
as 24-1635
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA LAMBERT
Defendant:
MIRIAM KASTLE, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU), DENNIS MCNEMARA, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU), KATHY GREY, Monroe Correctional Complex (SOU) and others
Bond v. Insurance Solutions Group of Utah, Inc.
as 1:2024cv01045
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bond
Defendant:
Insurance Solutions Group of Utah, Inc. doing business as Lambert Insurance Services
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
