Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv10357
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv30013
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 19-1900
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Louhghalam et al v. Trump, et al
as 1:2017cv10154
Respondent:
Donald J. Trump , U.S. Customs and Border Protection , John Kelly and others
Plaintiff:
Arghavan Louhghalam , Mazdak Pourabdollah Tootkaboni , Zahrasadat Mirrazi Renani and others
Amicu:
Amici Curiae Massachusetts Universities
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Amicus Curiae:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Vega v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
as 1:2016cv12534
Petitioner:
Richard Carl Vega
Respondent:
Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 16-1100
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv14237
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv13199
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1446
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
