Cases 31 - 40 of 190
Moore, et al v. The Bank of New York Mellon, et al
as 4:2020cv00200
Plaintiff:
Diane and James Moore, Diane Moore and James Moore
Defendant:
The Bank of New York Mellon, fka The Bank of New York as Successor in interest to JPMorgan Chase Bank NA as Trustee for Structured Asset Mortgage Investments II Inc. Bear Stearns ALT-A Trust 2005-5, Specialized Loan Servicing, LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Padilla v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00187
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, on Behalf of the Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities 1 Trust 2007-HE3, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE3
Plaintiff:
Juny D. Padilla
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Nava v. U.S. Bank NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE6, Asset-Ba et al
as 3:2020cv00009
Plaintiff:
Maria G. Nava
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA, Successor Trustee to Bank of America, NA, Successor in Interest to LaSalle Bank NA, on behalf of the Registered Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2005-HE6, Asset-Ba and Beverly Mitrisin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 4:2019cv01050
Plaintiff:
Laurie Williams and George Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A., Successor Trustee to LaSalle Bank National Association, On Behalf Of The Holders Of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I Trust 2007-HE7, Asset-Backed Certificates Series 2007-HE7 and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marsh, et al v. U.S. Bank N.A., et al
as 5:2019cv01306
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., Deborah Martin and U.S. Bank N.A. as Successor Trustee to Lasalle Bank Association on Behalf of the Holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities 1 Trust 2005-HE12, Asset Backed Certificates Series 2005-HE12
Plaintiff:
Ingrid Marsh and John Marsh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Bergman v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv04094
Plaintiff:
Helene Bergman
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc., U.S. Bank, N.A., successor trustee to Bank of America, N.A., successor in interest to LaSalle Bank N.A., as trustee on behalf of the holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities Trust 2004-1, Asset and SPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Whitaker v. U.S. Bank NA, successor trustee to Bank of America, NA, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank National Association, on behalf of the registered holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, A
as 4:2019cv03458
Defendant:
U.S. Bank NA, successor trustee to Bank of America, NA, successor in interest to LaSalle Bank National Association, on behalf of the registered holders of Bear Stearns Asset Backed Securities I LLC, A
Plaintiff:
Byron Whitaker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gooden v. Mackie et al
as 4:2019cv02948
Plaintiff:
Mary Gooden
Defendant:
Michael W. Zientz, Greg Abbot, All John & Jane Doe's (1-99) as Interested Parties/Custodians/Nominee(s) and/or successors and assigns and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronnie Lyles v. U.S. Bank, N.A.
as 8:2019cv01483
Plaintiff:
Ronnie Lyles and Ronnie Lyles individually doing business as Douglas Forrest Financial LLC
Defendant:
U.S. Bank, N.A. as Trustee for Certificateholders of BEAR STEARNS ASSET BACKED SECURITIES I LLC, ASSET BACKED CERTIFICATES, SERIES 2006-AC1 and U.S. Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Wells Fargo Bank National Association et al v. Angeles et al
as 4:2019cv04167
Defendant:
Fernando Angeles and Maria Teresa Angeles
Plaintiff:
Wells Fargo Bank National Association, Bear Stearns Mortgage Funding Trust 2006-AR2, Mortgage Pass-Through Certificates, Series 2006-AR2 and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
