Real Property Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 866
City National Bank v. Banco del Estado de Chile et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv03906
Plaintiff: City National Bank
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Donnelly Mechanical Corporation and Banco del Estado de Chile
3Rd Party Defendant: MEP Inspections, Inc., Tri-Star Construction Corp., WATERMAN 400 PARK JV LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
In Re: 650 Fifth Avenue
as 20-1265
Claimant: Patricia Milano, individually and on behalf of the Estate of Peter T. Milano, Babak Bayani, Raymond Smith, Sr. and others
Plaintiff: Noam Rozenman, Daniel Miller, Maria Acosta and others
Not Classified By Court: Richard W. Wood
Defendant: All funds formerly on deposit at JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., Baton Rouge, Louisiana, in Account Number 2724409590, in the name of ASSA Corporation, and all funds traceable thereto, All Right Title And Interest In 55-11 Queens Boulevard, All right, title and interest in the real property and appurtenances located at 55-11 Queens Boulevard, Queens, New York 11377, Block 1325 Lots 1,6,7 and 8 with all improvements and attachments, All Funds On Deposit At Sterling National Bank, All funds on deposit at Sterling National Bank in account number 3852524414 held in the name of Alavi Foundation and all funds traceable thereto and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: United States of America
Trustee: Kathleen A. Roberts
Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association v. Johnston We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2013cv50120
Defendant: Johnston Family Preservation Trust Dated, First National Bank in DeKalb, Ann M. Johnston and others
Plaintiff: Wells Fargo Bank Minnesota, National Association
3Rd Party Defendant: John Does 1-11, Anaida Mkhitarian, Ocwen Loan Servicing, LLC and others
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Ronald D Johnston
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Mortgage Foreclosure
Badeen et al v. PAR, INC. d/b/a PAR North America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv10532
Plaintiff: Midwest Recovery and Adjustment, Inc. and George badeen
Defendant: Renovo Services, LLC, Santander Consumer USA, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 7.226 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00361
Defendant: First National Bank of Rio Grande City, INTERNATIONAL BANK OF COMMERCE, LEGACY ADVANCE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS, LTD and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 4.056 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00289
Defendant: Texas National Bank, Starr Produce Company, AMEIDA SALINAS STARR COUNTY TAX ASSESSOR-COLLECTOR and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 3.306 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00278
Defendant: 3.306 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Texas National Bank, Americo Eloy Garcia, Jr. and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Potter et al v. Wells Fargo Bank NA et al
as 3:2020cv05901
Defendant: Wells Fargo Financial National Bank and Wells Fargo Bank NA
Plaintiff: Christina Potter and Jerry Potter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 2.574 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00253
Defendant: Ociel Mendoza, Martha N. Mendoza and 2.574 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS
Interested Party: Lone Star National Bank, International Bank of Commerce, Department of the Treasury - Internal Revenue Service and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. 0.892 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS et al
as 7:2020cv00248
Defendant: Texas National Bank, 0.892 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, Las Milpas, L.L.C. and others
Plaintiff: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?