Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Glenn Prentice, Sr. v. NewRez LLC, et al
as 24-1088
Plaintiff:
GLENN MICHAEL PRENTICE, SR.
Defendant:
NEWREZ LLC, dba Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing, TROTT LAW, P.C., MARCY J. FORD and others
Graham et al v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00958
Defendant:
Beneficial Financial I, Inc., Barrett Daffin Frappier Turner & Engel, LLP and Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angela L. Graham and Brenda J. Ford
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Graham et al v. Beneficial Financial I, Inc.
as 1:2016cv00937
Plaintiff:
Angela L. Graham and Brenda J. Ford
Defendant:
Beneficial Financial I, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
United States of America v. Ford et al
as 4:2012cv00059
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Frank J Ford and Hunters Crest Homeowners Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Foreclosure
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation v. Rudolph
as 2:2011cv10406
Plaintiff:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Defendant:
Ninevah N Rudolph, D Montgomery and Occupant
Counter_defendant:
US Bank National Association, 6576 Stonebridge E, West Bloomfield, MI, Freddie Mac and others
Counter_claimant:
D Montgomery
Langley v. Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. et al
as 1:2010cv00604
Plaintiff:
Sylvester Langley
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, L.L.C. , Unknown Parties, Trott & Trott, P.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ford v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 3:2009cv04816
Plaintiff:
John J. Ford, III
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, Washington Mutual Bank, California Reconveyance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Newbeck et al v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 4:2009cv01599
Plaintiff:
Veronica Newbeck and John J. Ford, III
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, Plaza Home Mortgage Inc and Washington Mutual Mortgage Securities Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601 Truth in Lending
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
