Cases 121 - 130 of 9,316
ROGERS v. A.O. SMITH CORP et al
as 2:2019cv05544
Defendant:
TEXTRON, SELBY BATTERSBY AND COMPANY, GOODYEAR CANADA and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT A. ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
PATRICK v. BAKER-SMITH et al
as 2:2019cv05587
Plaintiff:
TERRY PATRICK
Defendant:
TECMSEH BAKER-SMITH and JONIDA GEGA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv05324
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2019cv05228
Plaintiff:
FRED SMITH
Defendant:
PROGRESSIVE ADVANCED INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
GAY v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2019cv01311
Defendant:
POWERMASTER PACIFIC PRODUCTS, ZURN INDUSTRIES, FLUOR CONSTRUCTORS INTERNATIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
CARL E. GAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ADAMS COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 2:2019cv04438
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICA, INC., ORTHO-MCNEIL-JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., WATSON PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
ADAMS COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SMITH v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv04322
Defendant:
MERCK SHARP & DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
JANICE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. TARGET CORPORATION
as 2:2019cv04247
Defendant:
TARGET CORPORATION
Plaintiff:
KENTA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Long et al
as 1:2019cv01477
Defendant:
Amber M. Long, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Bradley D. Long
Plaintiff:
Michael Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
SMITH et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 2:2019cv03809
Defendant:
MCKEESON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
CHARLES SMITH and SHEILA SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
