Cases 11 - 20 of 15,434
South et al v. 3M Company et al
as 2:2024cv00597
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Robert South, Edward W Allsman, David L Berry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Steele v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02405
Plaintiff:
Thomas Allen Steele, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Bergeron
as 1:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Ms Lisa Ann Allen
Defendant:
Sidney Bergeron and Anna Bergeron
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 134 P.I.- Auto Negligence
James v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02237
Plaintiff:
Allen James
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Montalvo Cavazos v. Symons et al
as 7:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Raquel Montalvo Cavazos
Defendant:
James Allen Symons, Sr. and TRI-STATE TRUCKING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Allen v. Indivior, Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65430
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah N. Allen
Defendant:
Indivior, Inc., Indivior Solutions, Inc., Indivior PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dexter v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02165
Plaintiff:
David Allen Dexter
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2024cv01629
Plaintiff:
Teresa Allen
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
Nakisha Allen
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Allen v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02061
Plaintiff:
Richard Lawrence Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
