Cases 11 - 20 of 7,491
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4116
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO, A Delaware Corporation, BORGWARNER CORP, FKA BorgWarner Morse TEC, by its Successor Interest to, a Delaware Corporation, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware Corporation and HONEYWELL INTERNATIONAL INC, A Delaware Corporation, AKA Allied Signal
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4115
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant - Appellee:
ADVANCE AUTO PARTS INC, Corporate Successor to Western Auto Parts Inc, A Delaware Corporation, ALCO PRODUCTS INC, a New York Corporation, ALLIS CHALMERS CORP, a Delaware Corporation and others
In re: Asbestos Products Liabi
as 13-4115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CATHY ANN BAXLEY, individually and as personal representative of the Estate of Jimmie Williams
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR CO, A Delaware Corporation, BORGWARNER CORP, FKA BorgWarner Morse TEC, by its Successor Interest to, a Delaware Corporation, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, an Ohio Corporation and others
Defendant / Appellee:
GEORGIA PACIFIC LLC, a Delaware Corporation
MURPHY v. FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP. et al
as 2:2013cv60000
Plaintiff:
JANET MURPHY
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER ENERGY CORP., CARRIER CORPORATION , IMO INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Murphy v. Foster Wheeler Energy Corp. et al
as 1:2013cv10000
Plaintiff:
Janet Murphy
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Carrier Corporation , IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
Filing Error
as 1:2013cv00016
Plaintiff:
Janet Murphy
Defendant:
Foster Wheeler Energy Corp., Carrier Corporation , IMO Industries, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Asbestos Litigation
May et al v. A.C.&R. Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02836
Plaintiff:
Philip Royce May and Ruth Belchie May
Defendant:
A.C.&R. Insulation Co., Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. , Aurora Pump, Co and others
Cross_defendant:
A.C.&R. Insulation Co., Inc. , Armstrong International, Inc. , Aurora Pump, Co and others
Cross_claimant:
Armstrong International, Inc. , The Walter E. Campbell Company, Inc. , Crane Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Dilks v. 4520 Corp., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv02758
Plaintiff:
Joyce M. Dilks
Defendant:
4520 Corp., Inc. , AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Thirdparty_defendant:
John Crane Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company , Uniroyal Holding Inc. and others
Cross_claimant:
Crane Co. , The Walter E. Campbell , AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. and others
Cross_defendant:
4520 Corp., Inc. , A.W. Chesterton Company , AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. and others
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
E.L. Stebbing & Co., Inc. , MCIC, Incorporated and Hampshire Industries, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Oscar Allen Corley, et al v. Buffalo Pumps Inc, et al
as 11-4626
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OSCAR ALLEN CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
BUFFALO PUMPS INC, Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Forge Company, CBS CORP, A Delaware Corporation, F/K/A Viacom, Inc., Successor by Merger to CBS Corporation, A Pennsylvania Corporation F/K/A Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO and others
Oscar Allen Corley, et al v. Buffalo Pumps Inc, et al
as 11-4626
Plaintiff / Appellant:
OSCAR ALLEN CORLEY and MYRA CORLEY
Defendant / Appellee:
BUFFALO PUMPS INC, Successor-In-Interest to Buffalo Forge Company, CBS CORP, A Delaware Corporation, F/K/A Viacom, Inc., Successor by Merger to CBS Corporation, A Pennsylvania Corporation F/K/A Westinghouse Electric Corporation, CRANE CO and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
