Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Delarm v. King
as 2:2021cv04133
Plaintiff:
Scott Delarm
Defendant:
Joseph King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21183
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19902
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2020cv18508
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN JOSEPH KING JR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv83282
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KING v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv33061
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DIXON et al v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2019cv03069
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW JONES, JORDAN BLACKBURN, RICARDO DIXON and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dixon et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv02043
Plaintiff:
Matthew Jones, Jordan Blackburn, Ricardo Dixon and others
Defendant:
3M Company and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Acquafredda et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11429
Plaintiff:
Tung-Wun Kong Seid, John Marone, John J. Moran and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
KING v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2018cv00295
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOSEPH KING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
