Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Harris v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2015cv03353
Plaintiff:
Matt Harris
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Amaro v. Makita U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv13798
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Amaro
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc., Makita Corporation and Makita Corporation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Karavitis v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
as 3:2014cv00913
Plaintiff:
Eustathios Karavitis
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
GOHEN v. MAKITA CORPORATION et al
as 2:2014cv00148
Plaintiff:
YURI GOHEN
Defendant:
MAKITA CORPORATION , MAKITA CORPORATION OF AMERICA and MAKITA U.S.A., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ocacio v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2013cv22580
Plaintiff:
Victor Ocacio
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Didio et al v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.,
as 1:2012cv03855
Plaintiff:
Dawn Didio and Salvatore Didio
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Clark, et al v. Air Liquide America, et al
as 2:2003cv00376
Plaintiff:
Sebell Clark, et al
Defendant:
Air Liquide America Corporation, Clark Sales and Rentals, Inc., Clark Sand Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Biron v. Makita U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv10727
Plaintiff:
Ross Biron
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc., Makita Corporation and Makita Corporation of America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Soto et al v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 3:2010cv00236
Plaintiff:
Dennis Soto and Tracy Soto
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. and Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kveton v. Makita U.S.A., Inc.
as 4:2010cv00202
Defendant:
Makita U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Annette Kveton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
