Cases 21 - 30 of 33
Menin v. Cochlear Americas Coporation, et al
as 1:2014cv01097
Plaintiff:
Susan Menin
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 1:2014cv01133
Plaintiff:
John W. Rogers and Evelyn Rogers
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SHARP v. COCHLEAR LIMITED et al
as 2:2014cv01425
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN SHARP
Defendant:
COCHLEAR LIMITED and COCHLEAR AMERICAS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bortko v. Cochlear Americas Corporation et al
as 1:2014cv01329
Plaintiff:
Michael Bortko
Defendant:
Cochlear Americas Corporation and Cochlear Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thibodeau v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 2:2013cv02184
Plaintiff:
Justin Thibodeau
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lambert v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 3:2013cv03896
Plaintiff:
Brenda Lambert
Defendant:
Cochlear Americas Corporation and Cochlear Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Tansey v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 2:2013cv04628
Defendant:
Cochlear Americas Corporation and Cochlear Limited
Plaintiff:
Jeanine Tansey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Greenhaw et al v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 5:2013cv00446
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Greenhaw and Frank Greenhaw
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Bradford v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 1:2013cv00232
Plaintiff:
William Bradford
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Pawlik v. Cochlear Limited et al
as 1:2013cv01585
Plaintiff:
Pamela Pawlik
Defendant:
Cochlear Limited and Cochlear Americas Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
