Cases 21 - 30 of 50
Harriman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv00275
Plaintiff:
Nancy Harriman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Palmaz Scientific, Inc. v. Harriman
as 5:2015cv00734
Movant:
Dr. Richard Benedikt and Alan Chesler
Defendant:
Susan E. Harriman
Plaintiff:
Palmaz Scientific, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Harriman et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv08325
Plaintiff:
Barbara P. Harriman and Charles D. Harriman
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harriman v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv25095
Plaintiff:
Karen Harriman
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc., Cook Medical, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harriman v. Cook Incorporated et al
as 2:2014cv17137
Plaintiff:
Karen Harriman
Defendant:
Cook Incorporated, Cook Biotech, Inc. and Cook Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harriman v. Walker et al
as 1:2014cv00237
Defendant:
Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp., Patti Kemen, Patti Kemen Enterprises, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen Harriman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Harriman v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv01351
Plaintiff:
Karen Harriman
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc., American Medical Systems, Inc., American Medical Systems, Holdings Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Harriman v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv30970
Plaintiff:
Judith Harriman
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bridgewater et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2013cv23622
Plaintiff:
Patricia Bridgewater , Mindy Demaris , Shirley Garrison and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Harriman v. Cabela's Incorporated et al
as 1:2013cv02184
Plaintiff:
David Harriman
Defendant:
Cabela's Incorporated and Grizzly Bear Archery, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
