Cases 21 - 30 of 58
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv32186
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv16128
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER KENNETH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv06183
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv51355
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00883
Defendant:
AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and 3M COMPANY
Plaintiff:
KENNETH DAVIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AGUILAR v 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2019cv00891
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BROOKS, FRANK JAMES, KENNETH DAVIS and others
Defendant:
3M COMPANY and AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Davis v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00612
Defendant:
Aearo Technologies, LLC and 3M Company
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis
Aguilar et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2019cv00468
Plaintiff:
Michael Brooks, Frank James, Kenneth Davis and others
Defendant:
3M Company, Aearo Technologies LLC and Aearo Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vetter et al v. Marriott International, Inc.,
as 8:2019cv00094
Plaintiff:
Crystal Chambers, Richard Ryans, Brad Barringer and others
Defendant:
Marriott International, Inc.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1453 Class Action Fairness Act
Davis et al v. 3M Company et al
as 0:2018cv00653
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Davis and Jacqueline Davis
Defendant:
3M Company and Arizant Healthcare, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
