Cases 21 - 28 of 28
Nathaniel Johnson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2014cv00552
Defendant:
Does, Marine Corps Community Services and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Anderson et al v. Mason et al
as 2:2012cv00256
Plaintiff:
Sandra Anderson , Shawnkitta Arrington , Melvin Barnes and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Abney et al v. Gulfstream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00494
Plaintiff:
Robert Booker, Johnny Davis, Sharon Lett and others
Defendant:
CH2MHill Constructors, Inc., Bechtel International, Inc., Gulfstream Coach, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv00574
Plaintiff:
Sandra Anderson , All Plaintiffs , Shawnkitta Arrington and others
Defendant:
Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. and Bechtel National, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2011cv66779
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Climes v. Johnson et al
as 1:2008cv02860
Plaintiff:
Courtney Tiffany Climes
Defendant:
Nathaniel Johnson, III, Regency Professional Health Services For Women, Inc., West End Medical Centers, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Medical Malpractice
Johnson v. A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY) et al
as 2:2007cv66213
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Johnson
Defendant:
A.C. AND S., INC. (ARMSTRONG CONTRACTING & SUPPLY), A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., A.P. GREEN SERVICES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Warren Nathaniel Johnson Jr v. Department of Veterans Affairs
as 2:2007cv03316
Plaintiff:
Warren Nathaniel Johnson, Jr
Defendant:
Department of Veterans Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
