Cases 31 - 40 of 313
CANTU v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04149
Plaintiff:
ELIA GABRIELLA CANTU
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Silva v. USA
as 22-40835
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Hermilo Cantu Silva
Defendant / Appellee:
United States of America
Jesse Cantu v. Vimeo.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv08888
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
Vimeo.com, Inc., DOES 1 through 25, and Does 1 through 25
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Cantu v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04188
Plaintiff:
Ruperto Cantu
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
CANTU v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23592
Plaintiff:
VICTOR CANTU
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jesse Cantu v. Darden Corporation et al
as 2:2022cv08489
Plaintiff:
Jesse Cantu
Defendant:
Darden Corporation and Does 1 through 25, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Cantu et al v. Starr Indemnity & Liability Co.
as 2:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Rolando Cantu, Attorney Jason F. DeSouza, Attorney Paul T. Bowers and others
Defendant:
Starr Indemnity & Liability Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Cantu v. Sam's East, Inc.
as 4:2022cv03134
Plaintiff:
Amy Lynn Cantu
Defendant:
Sam's East, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
CANTU v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv17554
Plaintiff:
Brenda Cantu
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Richardson v. Walmart Stores Texas LLC et al
as 3:2022cv01936
Plaintiff:
TTijuana Lashawn Richardson and Tijuana Lashawn Richardson
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Stores Texas, LLC, Walmart, Inc. d/b/a Wal-Mart Neighborhood Market #2976, Walmart Real Estate Business Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
