Cases 31 - 37 of 37
THOMPSON et al v. A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2009cv88246
Plaintiff:
MARVIN B. THOMPSON and MILDRED THOMPSON
Defendant:
A.P. GREEN INDUSTRIES, INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv88911
Plaintiff:
MARVIN B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
THOMPSON v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv77593
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM B. THOMPSON and WILLIAM B. THOMPSON
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, ACF INDUSTRIES, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Clay et al v. Littleton Storm and Timber Service Inc
as 4:2009cv00233
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Clay, Shawn B Thompson and Marcus Clinksdale
Defendant:
Littleton Storm and Timber Service Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 0:2009cv00626
Plaintiff:
Charles R Thompson and Elizabeth B. Thompson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2009cv00045
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Thompson and Elizabeth B. Thompson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thompson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 6:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Thompson and Elizabeth B. Thompson
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, LLC
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
