Cases 31 - 40 of 1,252
Favre v. Sharpe
as 23-60610
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Brett Lorenzo Favre
Defendant / Appellee:
Shannon Sharpe
Jeannette Santini v. Jason Rucker
as 23-2180
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEANNETTE SANTINI
Defendant / Appellee:
JASON S. RUCKER, Judge, RAYMOND FRANCIS MORROGH, Counsel, WILLIAM JAMES MINOR, JR., Judge and others
Golov v. Frye
as 9:2023cv81459
Plaintiff:
Brett Golov
Defendant:
David Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Golov v. Frye
as 9:2023cv81460
Plaintiff:
Brett Golov
Defendant:
David Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Auto Negligence
Brett Berwick v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv05657
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Brett Berwick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tucker v. McChristy et al
as 1:2023cv05075
Plaintiff:
Anita Tucker
Defendant:
Brett McChristy and Crete Carrier Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Yancey v. Berhane et al
as 3:2023cv01306
Plaintiff:
Carry Yancey
Defendant:
Solomon Berhane and AT Trucking LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Brett Q. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Golov v. Frye
as 9:2023cv81455
Plaintiff:
Brett Golov
Defendant:
David Frye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Rose v. Target Corporation dba Target Store #2364
as 3:2023cv01235
Plaintiff:
Mary Jo Rose
Defendant:
Target Corporation dba Target Store #2364
Not Classified By Court:
Brett Q. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Henderson v. Arnaldo et al
as 3:2023cv01225
Plaintiff:
Amos Henderson
Defendant:
Ortiz Arnaldo and A&Y Brothers Trucking, LLC
Not Classified By Court:
Brett Q. Lucas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
