Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Sullivan et al v. New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc.
as 3:2012cv01257
Plaintiff:
Anna M. Sullivan and Dale Sullivan, Sr.
Defendant:
New England Compounding Pharmacy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal- Product Liability
Sullivan v. Marion Hardin Corrections Commission et al
as 3:2012cv02792
Plaintiff:
Edward M Sullivan
Defendant:
Marion Hardin Corrections Commission, Marion County Commissioners, Hardin County Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephen M Sullivan Jr v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 1:2012cv05787
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Sullivan Jr
Defendant:
Zimmer Inc, Zimmer Holdings Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stephen M Sullivan Jr v. Zimmer Inc et al
as 8:2012cv01112
Plaintiff:
Stephen M Sullivan Jr
Defendant:
Zimmer Holdings Inc, Zimmer Inc and Zimmer Orthopaedic Surgical Products Inc
OLIVO v. NASH CONTRACTING, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv03016
Plaintiff:
FRANCES OLIVO
Defendant:
NASH CONTRACTING, INC. and JON M. SULLIVAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SULLIVAN v. FOSTER WHEELER CO.
as 2:2011cv68394
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER CO.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv56406
Plaintiff:
WENDELL M. SULLIVAN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54740
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M SULLIVAN
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv54489
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M SULLIVAN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SULLIVAN v. ALCOA
as 5:2011cv54192
Plaintiff:
ROBERT M SULLIVAN
Defendant:
ALCOA
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
