Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Swisher et al v. Williams et al
as 3:2017cv00074
Plaintiff:
Randy Swisher, Sr. and Patricia Swisher
Defendant:
David A Williams and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Milburn et al v. Hudgens et al (TV3)
as 3:2017cv00035
Plaintiff:
Chris Milburn and Anita Milburn
Defendant:
Hugh D Hudgens, Shore Trucking Company, Inc., Averitt Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moses v. Bunch et al
as 3:2016cv00459
Defendant:
Ace American Insurance Company, Averitt Express, Inc. and James J. Bunch
Plaintiff:
Helen Moses
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal-Personal Injury
Granger v. Lopez et al
as 2:2016cv08174
Plaintiff:
Myron Granger
Defendant:
Carlos R Lopez , Averitt Express Inc , ACE American Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gaskins v. Ralph et al
as 3:2016cv00317
Plaintiff:
Doug Gaskins
Defendant:
Robert Ralph and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Keville v. Adams et al
as 2:2015cv02753
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KEVILLE
Defendant:
Eric A. Adams and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Keville v. Adams et al
as 1:2015cv02753
Plaintiff:
STEVEN KEVILLE
Defendant:
Eric A. Adams and Averitt Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers et al v. Averitt Express, Inc., et al
as 3:2015cv00706
Defendant:
Averitt Express, Inc. and Larry Killian
Plaintiff:
Kyrus Rogers and Toniyetta Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
BEISHL et al v. AVERITT EXPRESS, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv05761
Plaintiff:
KATHLEEN BEISHL and BARBARA STEELE
Defendant:
AVERITT EXPRESS, INC. and FREDDIE RACARD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Dempsey v. Averitt Express, Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv00651
Defendant:
Reginald Anderson and Averitt Express, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dempsey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
