Cases 41 - 50 of 52
CLARK v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv51153
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
CLARK v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv73810
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CLARK v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv31617
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Clark v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv05318
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Clark v. Medtronic, Inc.
as 2:2008cv00647
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clark et al v. Marinescu et al
as 3:2008cv01691
Plaintiff:
John Clark, John Clark, Patricia Clark and others
Defendant:
Mihai Marinescu, All Transport, Inc., E&D Transport, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Glover v. Prince Grorge County et al
as 5:2008cv02043
Plaintiff:
Jason Glover and Jason Glover
Defendant:
Prince Grorge County, Melvin High, Michael Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Clark v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2008cv00566
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc., Greyhound Lines, Inc., Laidlaw Transportation, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Clark v. Greyhound Lines, Inc. et al
as 2:2008at00288
Defendant:
Greyhound Lines, Inc. and Laidlaw Transportation, Inc.
Plaintiff:
John Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
CLARK v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64611
Plaintiff:
JOHN CLARK and JOHN CLARK
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
