Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Roman v. United States of America et al
as 1:2010cv03580
Plaintiff:
Joseph Roman
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Department of the Army and Sidney Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
James Huff v. US Dept of the Army
as 10-1436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES E. HUFF
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY et al
as 2:2009cv04265
Plaintiff:
LIBERTY MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant:
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, FLEET MANAGEMENT CENTER and TADD R. JENNINGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Plesha v. Ballard et al
as 1:2009cv03290
Plaintiff:
Thomas Plesha
Defendant:
Timothy Ballard and United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Knapp et al v. United States Of America et al
as 4:2008cv02026
Plaintiff:
Barbara C. Knapp and Darwin M. Knapp
Defendant:
United States Of America and United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Rettler et al v. United States Department of the Army
as 1:2007cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jaime Rettler
Involuntary Plaintiff:
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company and United Health of Wisconsin Insurance Company Inc
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Miller v. United States Department of Veterans' Army Medical Centers
as 3:2007cv00125
Plaintiff:
Hester Miller
Defendant:
United States Department of Veterans' Army Medical Centers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 Medical Malpractice
Channel v. United States Department of the Army et al
as 1:2007cv00003
Plaintiff:
Christopher Channel
Defendant:
United States Department of the Army, Donald Rumsfeld and John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
