Cases 51 - 60 of 73
Braun v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2015cv00063
Plaintiff:
David Steven Braun
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roundtree v. Microsoft Corporation
as 2:2015cv00760
Plaintiff:
Yvonne Roundtree
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2014cv00839
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Roy Day v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 14-35109
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROY A. DAY
Defendant - Appellee:
MICROSOFT CORPORATION, WILLIAM H. GATES, III and STEVEN A. BALLMER
Neeley v. Federal Communications Commissioners et al
as 5:2013cv05293
Plaintiff:
Curtis J Neeley, Jr.
Defendant:
Federal Communications Commissioners, John Boehner, Joe Biden and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0605
Newman v. Prudential Insurance Company of America, et al
as 2:2013cv02122
Plaintiff:
David Newman
Defendant:
Prudential Insurance Company of America and Microsoft
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451
Minister Victor McGee et al v. TD Service Company Inc et al
as 2:2013cv03183
Defendant:
2010-1 CRE Venture LLC, ABC Television Inc, Akin Gump Strauss Hauer and Feld LLP and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Billy Joe Johnson and Minister Victor McGee
Day v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
Roy A Day
Defendant:
Microsoft Corporation, William Henry Gates III and Steven A Ballmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Minister Victor McGee et al v. The United States Government et al
as 2:2013cv00116
Defendant:
2010-1 CRE Venture LLC, ABC Television, Ms Connie Alarcon and others
Plaintiff:
Mr Billy Joe Johnson and Minister Victor McGee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
