Cases 51 - 57 of 57
MCCOLLUM et al v. AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv85156
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD MCCOLLUM, WILLIAM RICHARD MCCOLLUM, DEBBIE MCCOLLUM and others
Defendant:
AMERICAN OPTICAL CORPORATION, CERTAINTEED CORPORATION, CONGOLEUM CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GARNETT et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2009cv73577
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD GARNETT and BARBARA J. GARNETT
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL, ANCHOR PACKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
GARNETT et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2009cv73576
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM RICHARD GARNETT and BARBARA J. GARNETT
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL, ANCHOR PACKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Eckenrode v. Fordree
as 8:2007cv03632
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Eckenrode
Defendant:
William Richard Fordree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Richards et al v. Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C et al
as 3:2007cv01669
Plaintiff:
Martha G Richards, Martha G Richards, Deborah Sisk Richards and others
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Louisiana L L C and Wal-Mart Stores Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
DOUGHERTY et al v. AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63016
Plaintiff:
ALBERT VINCENT DOUGHERTY, WILLIAM RICHARD GARNETT, BARBARA J. GARNETT and others
Defendant:
AMCHEM PRODUCTS INC., AMERICAN OPTICAL, ANCHOR PACKING and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Williams, et al v. A.P. Green Ind., et al
as 1:2001cv00213
Plaintiff:
Harry Cecil Burris, Charles Edward Bourn, Donell Smith and others
Defendant:
United States Mineral Products Co., Beazer East, Inc., Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
