Torts - Injury Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 179
Schreiber v. AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv01482
Plaintiff: Dorothy Schreiber
Defendant: AC&R Insulation Co., Inc. , A.O. Smith Corporation , A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Asbestos Prod Litigatio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2070
Plaintiff - Appellant: RUSSELL V. OSTRAND
Defendant - Appellee: A W CHESTERTON CO, BAYER CROPSCIENCE INC, successor Rhone-Poulenc AG Co., successor Benjamin Foster Inc, BECHTEL CORP and others
Debtor - Appellee: GENERAL REFRACTORIES CO
In re: Asbestos Prod Litigatio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2067
Plaintiff - Appellant: RONALD J MICHELS
Defendant - Appellee: A W CHESTERTON CO, CROSSFIELD CSR LTD, DAP INC and others
In re: Asbestos Prod Litigatio We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 12-2071
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL R. DUFFEY, Individually and as Special Administator of the Estate of Paul V. Duffey, deceased
Defendant - Appellee: A W CHESTERTON CO, ALFA LAVAL INC, AMTICO INTERNATIONAL INC and others
In re: Asbestos Prod Litigatio
as 12-2062
Plaintiff - Appellant: MICHAEL LUNDGREN, As Special Administrator for the Estate of Jim E. Lundgren
Defendant - Appellee: CBS CORP, UNIROYAL INC, A W CHESTERTON CO and others
PEHLKE v. A.O. SMITH CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv60049
Plaintiff: LUELLA C. PEHLKE
Defendant: A.O. SMITH CORPORATION , A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , BORG-WARNER, INC. and others
Cross_claimant: ROCKWELL AUTOMATION, INC. and BORG-WARNER, INC.
Cross_defendant: A.O. SMITH CORPORATION, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY , BORG-WARNER, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Charles C Curtis v. Abb Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv02014
Defendant: Abb Inc, American Insulated Wire Corporation, Borg Warner Morse Tec Inc and others
Plaintiff: Charles C Curtis
Unknown: Thomas Jeffrey Moses
Pehlke v. A.O. Smith Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00596
Plaintiff: Luella C Pehlke
Defendant: A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company, Borg-Warner, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manus v. 3M Company et al
as 3:2012cv00059
Plaintiff: Robert G Manus
Defendant: 3M Company, Airgas Merchant Gases, LLC, Borg-Warner Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ronald Seguine et al v. Ajax Boiler Inc et al
as 2:2011cv10316
Ued As Successor-by-merger To Buffalo Pumps Inc: Air and Liquid Systems Corporation
Defendant: Ajax Boiler Inc, Armstrong International Inc, Burnham LLC and others
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Chief Auto Part: Autozone West Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Borg-Warner Corporation: Borg-Warner Morse Tec Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Kragen Auto Supply Co: CSK Auto Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Cochrane Corporation: Crane Environmental Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Mundet Cork Company: Crown Cork and Seal Company Inc
Ued As Successor To Cutler-Hammer Inc: Eaton Corporation
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Northern Pump Company Fka Northern Fire Apparatu: FMC Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Bendix Corporation: Honeywell International Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor In Interest To DelavalTurbine Inc: IMO Industries Inc
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To York International: Johnson Controls Inc
Individually And As Successor In Interest To Kewanee Boiler Corporation: Oakfabco Inc
Ued Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Abex Corporation: Pneumo Abex Corporation
Plaintiff: Bonnie Seguine and Ronald Seguine
As Successor-in-interest To Titusville Forge Company: Struthers Wells Corporation
Individually And As Successor-in-interest To Zurn Industries Inc And Successor To Erie City Iron Wor: Zurn Industries LLC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?