Cases 71 - 80 of 102
ROACH v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00470
Plaintiff:
STEVEN D. ROACH
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF DEFENSE and others
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
Maxey v. Obama
as 2:2014cv00313
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
Barak Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Stafford v. Michigan, State of et al
as 2:2014cv10416
Plaintiff:
Felix Stafford, Jr.
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, Richard Snyder, Barack Obama and others
Ramn Segarra Berros v. United States of America, President Barak Obama et al
as 3:2014cv01046
Plaintiff:
Ramon Segarra-Berrios
Defendant:
United States of America, President Barak Obama, National Park Services, Department Of The Interior and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
TRICOME v. LEAHY et al
as 2:2013cv03314
Plaintiff:
DOMINIC TRICOME
Defendant:
PATRICK LEAHY , AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION, DEE BENSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
TRICOME et al v. STEELE
as 2:2013cv02184
Plaintiff:
DOMENIC TRICOME
Defendant:
MYRON STEELE
Movant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA , BARACK OBAMA , ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2679 Federal Driver's Act
Morgan v. Federal Government et al
as 3:2013cv01443
Plaintiff:
Timothy Leonard Morgan
Defendant:
Federal Government, President Obama, Eric Holder and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Lain v. FBI et al
as 2:2013cv11136
Plaintiff:
Robert Lain
Defendant:
FBI, NASA, Detroit Police Department and others
Jones v. Jones et al
as 5:2012cv04111
Plaintiff:
Chaya Jones
Defendant:
Naomi Jones, State Police, Rainbow Mental Health Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brown-Rodgers v. Bing et al
as 2:2012cv12962
Plaintiff:
Barbara Brown-Rodgers
Defendant:
David Bing , Black Race, Check & Go and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2674
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
