Cases 1 - 7 of 7
ST. JOHN et al v. ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN et al
as 1:2023cv02333
Defendant:
IRANIAN MINISTRY OF INTELLIGENCE & SECURITY, ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, ISLAMIC REVOLUTIONARY GUARD CORPS and others
Plaintiff:
KEVIN BRYAN ST. JOHN, JOHN CHARLES YOUNG II, ESTATE OF JAMES ELLIOTT KEGAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act
SIFFLES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC et al
as 3:2021cv02184
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC and JOHNSON & JOHNSON, INC
Plaintiff:
LISA SIFFLES and THE ESTATE OF JOY ANN HUNT
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv19344
Plaintiff:
LISA ANN HUNT
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC) and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HUNT v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv01106
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Carolyn Ann Hunt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slay v. IB Travelin, Inc., et al
as 2:2018cv02728
Defendant:
IB Travelin, Inc. and Domiruth Travel Services
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Hunt Slay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ingham et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2017cv01857
Defendant:
Imerys Talc America, Inc., Luzenac America, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Consumer Compaines, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Jamie Beagle Webster, Monica Sherise Sweat, Marvin Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Slay v. American Express Travel Corp. et al
as 2:2015cv02003
Plaintiff:
Barbara Ann Hunt Slay
Defendant:
American Express Travel Corp., American Express Company , Domiruth Travel Services and others
Miscellaneou:
Jimmy Moore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
