Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Stephens v. Budget/Avis Rental Car LLC et al
as 5:2023cv00614
Plaintiff:
K Stephens
Defendant:
Budget/Avis Rental Car LLC and Benjamin LNU
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. JDM Expedite, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, Craig Robert Fogleman, Auduariaus Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adams et al v. Yates et al
as 1:2020cv03560
Defendant:
Ean Holdings, Avis Rental and Becky Lee Yates
Plaintiff:
Daphne Nix and Charlette Oliva Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COLAVITO v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv19017
Defendant:
RAPHAEL PORTO, AVIS RENTAL COMPANY and THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff:
MICHELE COLAVITO
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1364
GODFREY v. NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION et al
as 2:2012cv03764
Plaintiff:
KINYUAN GODFREY
Defendant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION and CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Cross_claimant:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cross_defendant:
CENTRAL PARKING SYSTEM OF PENNSYLVANIA, INC.
Thirdparty_defendant:
AVIS RENTAL CAR COMPANY
Thirdparty_plaintiff:
NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Lee v. Schweback et al
as 1:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
In Hyong Lee
Defendant:
Mary Ann Schweback, PV Holding Corp. , Avis Budget Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy et al v. Martinez et al
as 5:2008cv01094
Plaintiff:
Amanda Kennedy and Peter Kennedy
Defendant:
Samuel Martinez, Avis Rental and Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Smith et al v. Budget Rental Car et al
as 2:2007cv02651
Plaintiff:
Damon L Smith and Tammy Smith
Defendant:
Budget Rental Car, Budget Rental Car, Budget Rental Car and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Auto Negligence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
