Cases 1 - 10 of 16
COX v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv20677
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHAD COX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv80270
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID CHAD COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv31113
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv21321
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID A COX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01932
Plaintiff:
DAVID E COX
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
COX v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv01732
Plaintiff:
DAVID E COX
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cox et al v. C. R. Bard, Inc.
as 2:2015cv16442
Plaintiff:
Sherry Lynn Cox and David A. Cox
Defendant:
C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kromtech of USA, LLC v. Cox et al
as 2:2014cv01550
Plaintiff:
Kromtech of USA, LLC
Defendant:
David A. Cox and Tech Talk America, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Niles v. Cox et al
as 6:2014cv00164
Plaintiff:
Katie Niles
Defendant:
David R Cox , National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh PA , J B Hunt Transport Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sonnier v. Cox et al
as 6:2012cv00814
Defendant:
David R Cox , J B Hunt Transport Inc and National Union Fire Insurance Co of Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
Plaintiff:
Kimberlie Sonnier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
