Cases 1 - 10 of 117
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31425
Plaintiff:
DAVID KENNEDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HAMILTON v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02450
Plaintiff:
DAVID KENNEDY HAMILTON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Kennedy v. 150 Rochester Hill LLC
as 1:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
David Kennedy
Defendant:
150 Rochester Hill LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
KRASNICK v. KENNEDY
as 2:2021cv04892
Plaintiff:
RICHARD KRASNICK
Defendant:
DAVID KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv08013
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HERZ v. YOUNG et al
as 1:2021cv00075
Defendant:
RECOVERY CENTERS OF AMERICA HOLDINGS LLC, MARC ROTHENBERG, VERIZON WIRELESS and others
Plaintiff:
CAROLYN WENDY HERZ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv28114
Plaintiff:
KENNEDY and DAVID KENNEDY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv19990
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JOHN DAVID KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
KENNEDY v BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC et al
as 3:2019cv02127
Defendant:
BP EXPLORATION & PRODUCTION INC and BP AMERICA PRODUCTION COMPANY
Plaintiff:
LEE DAVID KENNEDY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kennedy v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv12807
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Lee David Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
