Cases 1 - 10 of 1,016
White v. The Home Depot, USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv11537
Plaintiff:
Demetrius White
Defendant:
The Home Depot, USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Rose v. General Electric Company et al
as 5:2024cv00589
Plaintiff:
Mickey Rose
Defendant:
General Electric Company, Home Depot USA Inc, The Home Depot Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
De Darr v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 2:2024cv01051
Plaintiff:
Maria Castro De Darr
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hooton v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 4:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Adrienne Hooton
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Munsch et al v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00157
Plaintiff:
Pamela Munsch and William Munsch
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc. d/b/a The Home Depot
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sergei Kovalev v. Home Depot USA Inc, et al
as 24-2025
Plaintiff:
SERGEI KOVALEV
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA INC, HOME DEPOT INC, HOME DEPOT NO 4112 and others
KIlmer v. Home Depot USA, Inc.
as 3:2024cv00154
Plaintiff:
Michael C KIlmer
Defendant:
Home Depot USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
PYLES v. HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC. et al
as 2:2024cv06414
Plaintiff:
JEANETTE PYLES
Defendant:
HD DEVELOPMENT OF MARYLAND INC., THE HOME DEPOT USA INC., HOME DEPOT STORE #0919 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
ZHANG v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 1:2024cv06353
Plaintiff:
Xueyong Zhang
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morales v. HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
as 2:2024cv02126
Plaintiff:
Pedro Morales
Defendant:
HOME DEPOT USA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
