Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Law Offices of N.M. Gehi, P.C. v. Consumer Opinion, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv05468
Defendant:
Consumer Opinion, LLC, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Plaintiff:
Law Offices of N.M. Gehi, P.C.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Ogden v. United States of America et al
as 4:2016cv03193
Defendant:
Michael J. Allshouse, Douglas Bickal, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Michelle Ogden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Baugh v. Lynch et al
as 3:2015cv02096
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Baugh
Defendant:
City of Portland, Oregon, Drug Enforcement Administration, Federal Bureau of Investigation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Smith v. Penn Maritime Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv02038
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2, Penn Barge, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
William Smith
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Piscitelli v. County of Suffolk et al
as 2:2013cv04975
Defendant:
County of Suffolk, John Doe #1 2:13cv4975, John Doe #2 2:13cv4975 and others
Plaintiff:
Paul R. Piscitelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lengyel v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv03506
Defendant:
Home Depot U.S.A., Inc., John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Plaintiff:
Joe Attila Lengyel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
James v. Village of Hempstead et al
as 2:2012cv03402
Defendant:
P.O. Louis Arcila, P.O. Este, John Doe #1 and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WELLS et al v. KROGER COMPANY
as 1:2012cv00764
Defendant:
JOHN DOE #1, JOHN DOE #2, DR. PEPPER SNAPPLE GROUP, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER WELLS and TRAVIS W. WELLS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Culp v. Bisso et al
as 1:2011cv04411
Defendant:
William Bisso, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Plaintiff:
Freddie Culp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
