Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Rodney Mattix v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv03807
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney Mattix
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Mattix et al v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq00166
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
Frank Mattix
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Syngenta AG and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MATTIX v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv36954
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW AARON MATTIX
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
M.E.M. v. Juul Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02780
Defendant:
Juul Labs, Inc. agent of previously d/b/a PAX LABS, INC. and PLOOM INC., McLane Company, Inc., James Monsees and others
Plaintiff:
Morgan Emmaline Mattix and M. E. M.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mattix et al v. Sandoz Inc.
as 2:2017cv16062
Plaintiff:
Gail E. Mattix and Dennis Mattix
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crumedy v. Mid-States Packaging, Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv09977
Plaintiff:
Brandon O'Neal Crumedy
Defendant:
Mid-States Packaging, Inc. , Donald D Mattix and Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DePascal et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp22047
Plaintiff:
Brandon DePascal , Hilda DePascal , Emma Gross and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DePascal et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 2:2011cv02106
Plaintiff:
Brandon DePascal , Hilda DePascal , Emma Gross and others
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
