Cases 1 - 7 of 7
NELSON et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv17825
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL NELSON and THE ESTATE OF FELICIA LYNN
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MORRIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv21991
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL NELSON MORRIS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NELSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv95594
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
RUSSELL NELSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nelson v. AbbVie, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv05216
Plaintiff:
Russell Nelson
Defendant:
AbbVie, Inc., Abbott Laboratories, Inc., AbbVie Products, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Chambliss et al v. Gulf Stream Coach, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv04891
Plaintiff:
Valerie Adams, Linda Breland, Lina Imbraguglio and others
Defendant:
Fluor Enterprises, Inc. and Gulf Stream Coach, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00481
Plaintiff:
Russell Nelson, Russell Nelson, Russell Nelson and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Consol Plaintiff:
David Wood, David Wood, David Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Russell-Nelson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 3:2007cv01969
Plaintiff:
George Russell-Nelson, Annabelle Anasta, Donald Tucker and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
