Cases 1 - 9 of 9
PAUL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv05040
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
JUDICE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv04680
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL JUDICE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETLY LLC, AEARO LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TUGGLE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv86560
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL TUGGLE
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREGORY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv32503
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL GREGORY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDREWS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30534
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT PAUL ANDREWS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bradley et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2020cv00765
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Paul Bradley and Laurie Marie Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lopez v. BP Exploration & Production, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv10560
Defendant:
BP America Production Company and BP Exploration & Production, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Paul Lopez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Willden, Jerelyn The Estate of et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2015cv00532
Plaintiff:
Willden, Jerelyn The Estate of , Matthew Willden and Kenny Willden
Defendant:
Scott Paul Kelly , United States Government , Karren Hendrix Stagg Allen & Company PC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Industrial Piping, Inc. v. Zhang et al
as 3:2014cv00537
Plaintiff:
Industrial Piping, Inc.
Defendant:
Tao Zhang, Dayi Liu, Scott Paul and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
