Cases 1 - 10 of 538
Morejon v. DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
as 0:2024cv61020
Plaintiff:
Mayda Juana Morejon
Defendant:
DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Morejon v. DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
as 1:2024cv22282
Plaintiff:
Mayda Juana Morejon
Defendant:
DSW Shoe Warehouse, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 2:2024cv02069
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VAN HORN v. THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
as 5:2024cv02080
Plaintiff:
TIFFANI VAN HORN
Defendant:
THE SHOE DEPARTMENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Bradshaw v. DSW, Inc et al
as 4:2024cv01552
Plaintiff:
Gwendolyn G Bradshaw
Defendant:
DSW, Inc. dba DSW Shoe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Todd v. Shoe Show, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Peggy Todd
Defendant:
Shoe Show, Inc. doing business as Shoe Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Koot v. BWDAC, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv00190
Plaintiff:
Clemens A Koot
Defendant:
BWDAC, Inc., Pneumo Abex LLC, DCO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Marquez v. Rack Room Shoes, Inc.
as 3:2023cv03859
Plaintiff:
Michael Marquez
Defendant:
Rack Room Shoes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
JOHNSON v. AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al
as 0:2023cv61258
Plaintiff:
FRENCH E. JOHNSON
Defendant:
AECOM ENERGY & CONSTRUCTION, INC., Aerojet Rocketdyne, Inc., Air & Liquid Systems Corporation (Successor by merger to Buffalo Pumps, Inc.) and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Asbestos Litigation
Smith v. Shoe Show, Inc.
as 6:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Annette Smith
Defendant:
Shoe Show, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
