Cases 1 - 10 of 14
FRANKLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv30337
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FRANKLIN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Davidson v. Franklin et al
as 1:2023cv00398
Plaintiff:
Sean S Davidson
Defendant:
Scott Franklin and Jason L Cotherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WOLFE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv06445
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FRANKLIN WOLFE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
STAGGS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv20578
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FRANKLIN STAGGS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv43075
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv87050
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DANIEL SCOTT FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRANKLIN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv53241
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT FRANKLIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Penn v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv03138
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Scott Franklin Penn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johnson v. Schubert et al
as 2:2017cv00666
Plaintiff:
Othello C.M. Johnson
Defendant:
Anne Marie Schubert, Jan Scully, David Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Butler v. Tamimi
as 0:2015cv00087
Defendant:
Tamimi and Essam Al Tamimi
Plaintiff:
Butler and Scott Franklin Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
