Cases 1 - 10 of 91
Sweat v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2023cv04213
Plaintiff:
Lashawn Sweat
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SWEAT et al v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv18880
Plaintiff:
SIMON C. SWEAT and THE ESTATE OF JONA SWEAT
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON HOLDCO (NA) INC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SWEATS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv19676
Plaintiff:
CARYN SWEATS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, AEARO LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SWEAT v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv22366
Plaintiff:
OMAR SWEAT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Barber v. BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC. et al
as 9:2022cv80831
Plaintiff:
Norma Barber as the Administrator of the Estate of Gerald Sweat and Norma Barber
Defendant:
BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM PHARMACEUTCALS, INC., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Sweat v. Syngenta Crop Protection LLC et al
as 3:2022pq01021
Plaintiff:
Gerry Don Sweat
Defendant:
Syngenta Crop Protection LLC and Syngenta AG
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sweat v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.
as 7:2021cv07685
Plaintiff:
Inetha Sweat
Defendant:
Wal-Mart Associates, Inc. and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr
SWEAT v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv28622
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BOBBY WAYNE SWEAT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
