Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Trawally v. Swann et al
as 1:2020cv02172
Defendant:
Crete Carrier Corporation, The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company of Connecticut and James Swann
Plaintiff:
Famara Trawally
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bishop v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv30029
Plaintiff:
Brian R Bishop
Defendant:
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548
Bishop v. Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company
as 3:2020cv30028
Plaintiff:
Brian R Bishop
Defendant:
Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection and Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 548
PEPLOWSKI et al v. ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv91130
Plaintiff:
JUDY PEPLOWSKI and JOSEPHINE BORSICK
Defendant:
ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY, ACE PROPERTY AND CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, AETNA LIFE INSURANCE AND ANNUITY COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHAW v. INC AMERICAN STANDARD et al
as 2:2009cv71034
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAM SHAW
Defendant:
INC AMERICAN STANDARD, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHAW v. INC AMERICAN STANDARD et al
as 2:2009cv71032
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAM SHAW
Defendant:
INC AMERICAN STANDARD, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SHAW v. INC AMERICAN STANDARD et al
as 2:2009cv71033
Plaintiff:
CHARLES WILLIAM SHAW
Defendant:
INC AMERICAN STANDARD, KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, AC&S INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Kortekamp v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2008cv00043
Plaintiff:
Todd Kortekamp
Defendant:
3M Company, A.O. Smith Corporation, A.W. Chesterton Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
