Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Smith v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2024cv00334
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Smith et al v. Woolace Electric Corp. et al
as 3:2017cv02578
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith and Menno Schwartz, Jr.
Defendant:
Woolace Electric Corp. , Steven Garza and Cory McManues
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith et al v. Carter-Jones Lumber Company
as 2:2015cv12158
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith and Leroy Eicher, Jr.
Defendant:
Carter-Jones Lumber Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Smith v. Van Laar et al
as 1:2014cv03319
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Smith , Sr.
Defendant:
William H. Van Laar, DO , William Van Laar CO, LLC , Jodi Pesce and others
Consol_defendant:
Daniel Huff and Nathan Cronic
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SMITH v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv54643
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv57353
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv34216
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
SMITH v. SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
as 2:2010cv34132
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
SEATRAIN LINES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH v. U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
as 2:2009cv88890
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH
Defendant:
U.S. RUBBER COMPANY (UNIROYAL)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
SMITH et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2009cv75004
Plaintiff:
THOMAS E. SMITH, CAROLYN W. SMITH and CAROLYN W. SMITH
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, CELOTEX CORPORATION, FIBREBOARD CORP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
