Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Nichols et al v. United States Steel Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Nichols, Jr. and Brenda Lee Nichols
Defendant:
United States Steel Corporation, U.S. Steel Tubular Products, LLC and Adam Cliett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
MURRAY AMERICAN RIVER TOWING, INC.
as 2:2017cv01315
Plaintiff:
MURRAY AMERICAN RIVER TOWING, INC.
Defendant:
TINA VAHOSKY and U.S. STEEL CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Mary Richards v. U.S. Steel
as 16-2436
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY R. RICHARDS
Defendant - Appellee:
U.S. STEEL
Richards v. U.S. Steel
as 3:2015cv00646
Plaintiff:
Mary R Richards
Defendant:
U.S. Steel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bartlett et al v. Bath Iron Works Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00345
Plaintiff:
Dale Bartlett and Maxima Bartlett
Defendant:
Bath Iron Works Corporation, Crane Co., General Dynamics Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hulen et al v. Crane Co. et al
as 4:2013cv02631
Plaintiff:
Mary Hulen and Mary Amida Spear Hulen
Defendant:
Crane Co , Union Carbide Corporation , Flowserve Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67788
Plaintiff:
KENNETH R. JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HARBIN v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67790
Plaintiff:
HUGH RAY HARBIN
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
McDANIEL v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67787
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM McDANIEL
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JONES v. 3M et al
as 2:2011cv67785
Plaintiff:
VENISE FAYE JONES
Defendant:
3M , ANCHOR DARLING VALVE COMPANY, A.W. CHESTERTON COMPANY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
