Cases 11 - 20 of 51
Turner v. CarMax Auto Superstores Inc
as 4:2019cv00556
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores Inc
Plaintiff:
Todd Turner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
India Kahclamat v. William Nash, et al
as 18-10709
Plaintiff - Appellant:
INDIA SAMONE KAHCLAMAT, Intervenor
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM NASH, THOMAS REEDY, SARAH EDMONDSON, and Representatives on Behalf of and others
Mamedov v. CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00294
Plaintiff:
Ravshan Mamedov
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Diaz v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC et al
as 1:2015cv00523
Plaintiff:
Maria Elena Diaz
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Frank Smiderle v. CarMax Auto Superstore, Inc. et al
as 5:2015cv00593
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstore, Inc. and Does
Plaintiff:
Frank Smiderle
Jeffrey Broggie et al v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv09570
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Broggie and Kolleen Broggie
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC, Does and Santander Consumer USA, Inc.
Kathleen Gomez v. Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv09019
Defendant:
Carmax Auto Superstores California, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Kathleen M. Gomez
Keeya Shaunta Malone v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv08978
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Keeya Shaunta Malone
Daniel Richard Arthur Hermes v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC et al
as 8:2014cv01714
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC and Does
Plaintiff:
Daniel Richard Arthur Hermes
Sigala v. CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC
as 1:2014cv01451
Plaintiff:
Patricia A Sigala
Defendant:
CarMax Auto Superstores California, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
