Cases 1 - 10 of 22
Brycen Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv05027
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Christopher Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04990
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Daffern et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00817
Plaintiff:
Brycen Daffern, David Dahl, Susan Dailey and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Adams et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00776
Plaintiff:
Stacia Durst, Christopher Adams, Mike Alexander and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Dailey v. A&W Concentrate Company et al
as 4:2020cv02732
Defendant:
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc. and A&W Concentrate Company
Plaintiff:
Steve Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Megan Ann Dailey v. Banc of California N.A. et al
as 3:2017cv05371
Defendant:
Banc of California N.A. and Dovenmuehle Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Megan Ann Dailey
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Jeffrey Allen v. John Dailey
as 17-1971
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY ALLEN
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN DAILEY, DAN BERRY, CEO Duke University Federal Credit Union and ALEX HOLMES, Money Gram CEO
Defendant:
CHIEF CERELYN DAVIS, Durham Police Department
Dailey v. Dailey
as 2:2016cv00019
Plaintiff:
Olivia Dailey
Defendant:
Charles M. Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Dailey
as 2:2013cv00722
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Matthew Dailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 USA Plaintiff-Property Damage
Anaeme v. United States of America et al
as 2:2012cv01275
Defendant:
Acevado, Joseph L. Adams, Robert Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Chibueze C. Anaeme
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
