Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gusmer v. Revis et al
as 1:2019cv00289
Defendant:
Jody Luihn, Flat Rock Cider Group, LLC, Flat Rock Cider Works, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick E. Gusmer, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Renewable Resource Energy Systems Incorporated et al v. Revis
as 1:2019cv00169
Plaintiff:
Renewable Resource Energy Systems Incorporated, Windy Hill Orchard, Inc. and Frederick E. Gusmer, Jr
Defendant:
James M. Revis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIDSON COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION, ENDO HEALTH SOLUTIONS, INC., MALLINCKRODT LLC and others
Plaintiff:
DAVIDSON COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
CABARRUS COUNTY v. PURDUE PHARMA L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00474
Plaintiff:
CABARRUS COUNTY
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA L.P., PURDUE PHARMA INC., THE PURDUE FREDERICK COMPANY, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cleveland County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv00061
Plaintiff:
Cleveland County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mecklenburg County v. Purdue Pharma L.P. et al
as 3:2018cv00071
Plaintiff:
Mecklenburg County
Defendant:
Purdue Pharma L.P., Purdue Pharma, Inc., Purdue Frederick Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertie, et al v. GAF Building Materials Corp.
as 7:2014cv00165
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Robertie and Veronica B. Robertie
Defendant:
GAF Building Materials Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Robertie, et al v. GAF Building Materials Corp.
as 4:2014cv00145
Plaintiff:
Frederick C. Robertie and Veronica B. Robertie
Defendant:
GAF Building Materials Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Evans, et al v. Sokol
as 7:2011cv00065
Plaintiff:
Jeffery Evans , Frederick Evans , Gregory Evans and others
Defendant:
Igor Sokol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
