Cases 1 - 10 of 365
Jacobs v. AIG Specialty Insurance Company et al
as 1:2024cv21633
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Jacobs
Defendant:
AIG Specialty Insurance Company and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Jacob v. Truist Bank
as 1:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Esther Jacob
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Jacob v. Truist Bank
as 8:2024cv01176
Plaintiff:
Esther Jacob
Defendant:
Truist Bank
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ulrich et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv11007
Plaintiff:
Cole Ulrich, Paul Aiello, Angela Bailey and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Rivera v. Matasar et al
as 1:2024cv00307
Plaintiff:
Timothy J. Rivera
Defendant:
Scott Matasar and Matasar Jacobs, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Yu v. Vidy, Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv00964
Plaintiff:
Davis Yu
Defendant:
Vidy, Inc., Patrick Colangelo and Jacob Rosin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Mid-Castle Development Limited v. Liqueous LP et al
as 1:2024cv20511
Plaintiff:
Mid-Castle Development Limited
Defendant:
Liqueous LP and Jacob Fernane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Jacobs v. Barclays Bank PLC
as 1:2024cv00909
Plaintiff:
Joshua Jacobs
Defendant:
BARCLAYS BANK PLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Garland et al v. The Kroger Co.
as 3:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Chelsea Garland and Leroy Jacobs
Defendant:
The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Kline et al v. Quinn et al
as 8:2024cv00232
Plaintiff:
Walter Kline and Cynthia Kline
Petitioner:
Jacob Kline, ONOREVOLE CONSULTING GROUP, INC., PRIVCAP GROUP, LLC and others
Defendant:
Brian Quinn and Michael Swan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
