Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Patsy Cline Enterprises, LLC v. Bayliss et al
as 3:2021cv00518
Plaintiff:
Patsy Cline Enterprises, LLC
Defendant:
Mark Bayliss and Visual Link Internet, L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1501
Bickelmann et al v. Klein et al
as 1:2019cv04653
Defendant:
Gary S Klein, Etourdissant LLC, Klein Samuel and others
Plaintiff:
Spezi LLC and Jenna Bickelmann
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Global Beauty Group, LLC et al v. Visual Beauty, LLC et al
as 1:2016cv09214
Plaintiff:
Global Beauty Group, LLC and MOD Beauty, LLC
Defendant:
Visual Beauty, LLC, TPR Holdings, LLC, Stacey Schieffelin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Visual Mining, Inc. v. Ziegler
as 8:2012cv03227
Plaintiff:
Visual Mining, Inc.
Defendant:
Tristan Ziegler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. et al v. GUS Power Incorporated et al
as 1:2010cv09391
Plaintiff:
Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. , Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC and LUMI Solair, LLC
Defendant:
GUS Power Incorporated , D.L. May & Associates LTD. , Efston Science Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Peter M. Blauzvern DDS PC et al v. Brican America, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv20782
Plaintiff:
Peter M. Blauzvern DDS PC , Jeff E. Donnelly , John M. Highsmith, DDS, PA and others
Defendant:
Brican America, Inc. , Brican America, LLC , Brican Financial Services, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Visual Telecommunications Network, Inc. v. Daie
as 1:2008cv01188
Plaintiff:
Visual Telecommunications Network, Inc.
Defendant:
Arman Daie
Cause Of Action: Diversity
INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC. v. VISUAL LEGACY GROUP, LLC. et al
as 1:2007cv01866
Plaintiff:
INNOVATIVE SOFTWARE SOLUTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
VISUAL LEGACY GROUP, LLC., VISUAL LEGACY GROUP, LLC., RICK FORTIN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
