Cases 91 - 100 of 169
Federal National Mortgage Association et al v. Jose M Mendoza et al
as 5:2013cv01722
Movant:
Edwin Barajas
Defendant:
Does, Jose M Mendoza and Maria T Mendoza
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Federal Nat'l Mortage Assoc v. Phillip Sinta
as 13-2217
Plaintiff - Appellee:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION
Defendant - Appellant:
PHILLIP SINTA
Phillip Sinta, et al v. Orlans Associates P.C., et al
as 13-2174
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PHILLIP SINTA
Plaintiff:
DOUGLAS DWIGHT BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
ORLANS ASSOCIATES P.C., CHRISTINE RICHTER, ELIZABETH M MESSING and others
Kropek v. Sullivan et al
as 2:2013cv13573
Plaintiff:
Pinto Kropek
Defendant:
Brian Sullivan , Mark A McConnell, Trott & Trott, PC and others
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Sinta
as 2:2013cv13349
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Defendant:
Phillip Sinta
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Silvia Morales et al
as 8:2013cv01059
Defendant:
Does and Silvia E Morales
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Real Party In Interest Defendant:
Lesbia Morales
Sinta et al v. Orlans Associates, PC et al
as 2:2013cv13040
Plaintiff:
Phillip Sinta and Douglas Dwight Bennett
Defendant:
Orlans Associates, PC, Christine Richter, Elizabeth M Messing and others
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Ward E Webster et al
as 5:2013cv01042
Defendant:
Does and Ward E Webster
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Loveless et al v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 3:2013cv01546
Plaintiff:
Russell R Loveless and Mary Ellen Hennings
Defendant:
Bank of America, N.A., BAC Home Loans Servicing, LP, Merscorp Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Federal National Mortgage Association v. Ward E Webster et al
as 5:2013cv01043
Defendant:
Does and Ward E Webster
Plaintiff:
Federal National Mortgage Association
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
