Cases 91 - 100 of 125
McIntyre v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01046
Plaintiff:
Blaire R. McIntyre
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Paul D. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Lees v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01034
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Plaintiff:
Richard Gail Lees
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradshaw v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv01035
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Joseph Gasper
Plaintiff:
Reginald Timothy Bradshaw
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Otworth v. Whitmer
as 1:2020cv00944
Plaintiff:
Clarence Otworth
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00935
Plaintiff:
Bernard Sutton
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Joseph M. Gasper, Robert Faulk and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Election Integrity Fund et al v. Whitmer
as 1:2020cv00805
Plaintiff:
One Nation Michigan and Election Integrity Fund
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Eason v. Whitmer et al
as 3:2020cv12252
Plaintiff:
Donald Eason
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Jocelyn Benson and Jonathan Brater
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Castillo et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00751
Defendant:
Robert Gordon, gary mcdowell and Gretchen Whitmer
Plaintiff:
Dulce Sostenes, Veronica Botella, Susana Castillo and others
Amicus Curiae:
Richard Abraham Primus
Petitioner:
Worker Advocates, Unions, Community Organizations and Health Experts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling Centers Association of Michigan et al v. Whitmer et al
as 1:2020cv00737
Plaintiff:
Forest View Lanes, LLC, Bowling Centers Association of Michigan, R2M, LLC Michigan limited liability company doing business as Spectrum Lanes and others
Defendant:
Dana Nessel and Gretchen Whitmer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Marshall v. George et al
as 1:2020cv00722
Defendant:
Ron Wiles, Nick George, Marcus Ferguson and others
Plaintiff:
Delmond Marshall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
