Cases 101 - 110 of 426
Lockhart v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 1:2021cv00710
Defendant:
Alyssa D Emery, Erin Schaible, Joe Johnson #22 and others
Plaintiff:
Patrick O. Lockhart, K. L. and B. L.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roscoe v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00708
Plaintiff:
Emmitt G Roscoe, Jr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe et al
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zahir v. Northam, et al.
as 3:2021cv00361
In Re:
Naja Talibah Zahir
Defendant:
Governor Ralph Northam, Commonwealth of Virginia, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ince v. Northam, et al.
as 3:2021cv00362
In Re:
Natalia Dominique Ince
Defendant:
Ralph Northam, Commonwealth of Virginia, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Menders et al v Loudoun County School Board
as 1:2021cv00669
Plaintiff:
Scott Mineo, Jane Doe #1, Jane Doe #3 and others
Defendant:
Loudoun County School Board
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Soyinka v Arlington County, et al
as 1:2021cv00645
Defendant:
Virginia Hospital Center, Western State Hospital, Western State Hospital Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe v. Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University et al
as 7:2021cv00306
Defendant:
Kathryn Polidoro, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University and Timothy Sands
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Petitioner:
Non-Party Movant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reid v. James Madison University et al
as 5:2021cv00032
Defendant:
Heather Coltman, Jane or John Does 1-5, Jonathan R. Alger and others
Plaintiff:
Alyssa Reid
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Stout et al v. Doe et al
as 1:2021cv00559
Defendant:
John Doe and Kalenich
Plaintiff:
Robert B. Stout and Marc J. Stout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sellers et al
as 5:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Chandler Thomas, Stephen Monticelli, Jane and John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Maida Itze Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
