Cases 121 - 130 of 515
HARRIS v. GEICO et al
as 3:2018cv01300
Respondent:
KATIE ROSS, GEICO and DAREK CLYDE ADAMS ESTATE
Petitioner:
JOHN W HARRIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harcrow v. Harcrow et al
as 3:2018cv00828
Defendant:
Millersville, TN, City of, John Does 1-99, Clyde Harcrow and others
Plaintiff:
Mary Beth Harcrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pemberton et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv07908
Plaintiff:
Christian Baptiste, Dr. Clyde Pemberton and Thomas Debnam
Defendant:
The City of New York, NYPD Officer Anthony Sengco, NYPD Officers John and Jane Does #1-4 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Hale
as 1:2018cv08113
Plaintiff:
D. Williams
Defendant:
Mike Hale, Dan Smith, Omar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv
Bey et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv04655
Plaintiff:
Steven Seymour, Clyde Phillips, Salik Bey and others
Defendant:
FDNY, City of New York, Fire Commissioner Daniel Nigro and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv00647
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Henderson et al v. Adams et al
as 1:2018cv01371
Defendant:
Public Defender Catherine Himes, Judge Michael Flannelly, Judge Joseph Adams and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Jackson, Franklin Jackson, Rashi Tyler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Adams v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2018cv03401
Plaintiff:
Dennis Adams
Defendant:
John Does 1-4, Detective Clyde Moyer, Detective Matthew Reich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03372
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Bey v. State of Florida et al
as 3:2018cv00503
Plaintiff:
Asad Hajur Bey
Defendant:
State of Florida, Clyde Wolfe, Brandon Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
